Question: North wants a minor suit Jacoby transfer. South transfers to clubs instead of diamonds. What was the correct bidding sequence?
North had a difficult decision about what to do when partner
opened 1NT. Based on points and a nice 5 card suit, it's understandable to want
to invite game. However, the singleton heart makes it scary. We'd love to have
a bid available for this hand that says to partner: "Bid 3NT if you have a
maximum for 1NT, but only if you aren't worried about hearts. Such a bid doesn't
exist, because it doesn't come up often enough to allocate it bidding space.
North would love to describe his hand and leave the decision to South. I can't
think of a way to describe that hand without a likelihood of getting too high.
North has to be the decider, as uncomfortable as that may be. Here are North's
options:
1. Pass 1NT, almost surely get a plus score, but risk
missing a game that others will bid.
2. Bid 2NT, inviting partner's input, and
risk a minus score.
3. Transfer to 3 diamonds and plan to pass when partner bids it.
There are several ways to get to 3 diamonds: Use 2NT or 3
clubs as a direct transfer. Alternatively (This is the way most people do it,
not necessarily the best), bid 2 spades transferring to clubs then bid diamonds.
The transfer to clubs is artificial and you aren't saying anything about
the club suit. 3 diamonds at this point is absolutely not forcing or
invitational. The 1NT bidder is commanded to pass. 3 diamonds could prove to be
the best contract, but most likely it's 2nd or 3rd best and will tend to get a
below average board.
What seems to have happened here is that North didn't
feel good about the above options and tried to change directions after trying
to end in 3 diamonds. 4 clubs was a confusing bid. It didn't describe the hand
and didn't make a decision. One point in the play. When you find yourself in a
contract that no one else is likely to bid, take your finesses the opposite
direction from what others are likely to do. That might salvage a couple of matchpoints
on the actual hand.
No comments:
Post a Comment