Vic:East should not open either
one of those two bids.
The overwhelming majority of
modern day players have a partnership agreement that an Opening Bid of 2C
promises a 22+ point hand. Be that the case with the EW pair above, East should
clearly not open 2C. Weak Two bids promise exactly a 6 card suit. That means 2C
would not be an appropriate bid if East were trying to show a weak hand either.
Preemptive three level bids
promise exactly a 7 card suit which is what East is holding. The problem is
that the East hand is NOT weak. East has a (bottom of line) opening bid point
count. That means 3C would not be an appropriate opening bid either.
One alternative possibility
would be for East to open 1C which would give them the option to rebid clubs
later in the auction to show a 6+ card suit.
Another alternative
possibility, given that East has reason to believe South has a big hand, would
be for East to open 4C or even 5C in an attempt to keep NS (who might very well
have a major suit golden fit) out of the auction. EW are not vulnerable which
lowers the penalty for going down. Looks to me like NS can make slam in hearts
or spades which would give EW a much worse score than going down a few tricks
in a club contract.
Question: The hand record
above indicates that West was dealer which apparently means that West &
North both passed. North has a 13 point hand with 2.5 quick tricks & a very
nice club singleton. I would expect North to bid 1H which eliminates the
question of what East should "open".
No comments:
Post a Comment