Question: Instead of 1S should West have jumped the bid? If so how high should West have gone on the first bid?Vic:
Good Calls
West (Advancer in the auction
as given above) was correct to bid 1S. A common partnership agreement is that a
new suit by Advancer in not forcing. So the subsequent Pass by
East was also correct.
A common partnership
agreement is that a jump shift in competition (2S by West over 1D) would be
weak, promising six spades, but less than an opening hand. A jump shift to
3S would also be weak, promising seven spades. So no, West should not
have jumped the bid.
Bad Bid
Shame on East big time for
overcalling 1D with their pitiful suit & hand.
One purpose of an overcall is
to compete for the contract. An overcall holding less than an opening hand
should promise a solid suit. Ya think South might be quivering with excitement
at the thought of EW landing in a diamond contract? I would be if I was South.
Another purpose of an
overcall is to interfere with Opponent's auction by using up bidding
space. Wow, East certainly used up a lot of bidding space, did they not. No
gold star award for that one.
A third purpose of an
overcall is to suggest an opening lead to partner should the two of you end up
defending with partner on lead. I would be embarrassed to encourage partner to
lead a suit in which Jack was my highest honor. Keeping score? East is zero for
three.
Timid No Bid
Given that North decided they
had a hand good enough to open in 1st seat (I agree), I fault them for being
too timid to rebid clubs on their 2nd chance to call to tell partner about
their 6-card suit.
Vic Does Auction
1C P
1D 1S 2C
P P 2S P
P P
West deserves to take nine
tricks playing in a spade contract. The best NS deserve is to take seven tricks
in clubs.
Ain't bridge a great game?
No comments:
Post a Comment