Sunday, February 25, 2024

Bridge Quiz - February 26, 2024 - Origin of Vulnerability

 When you go to a beginning bridge class, one of the terms you encounter is either vulnerable or vulnerability.  Vulnerable means  susceptible    to  harm and you wonder what this has to do with bridge.  You later find out vulnerability involves scoring dependent on the hand and  the number of tricks taken.  You wonder who ever invented this?  Which of these people are responsible?

  • Charles Goren
  • Ely Culbertson
  • Eddie Kantar
  • Harold Vanderbilt

Answer:  Harold Vanderbilt

.In 1925, while on board SS Finland, he originated changes to the scoring system through which the game of contract bridge supplanted auction bridge in popularity. Three years later he endowed the Vanderbilt Cup awarded to the winners of the North American team-of-four championship (now the Vanderbilt Knockout Teams, or simply "the Vanderbilt", one of the North American Bridge Championships marquee events). In 1932 and again in 1940 he was part of a team that won his own trophy; it remains one of the most prized in the game. Vanderbilt also donated the World Bridge Federation Vanderbilt Trophy, awarded from 1960 to 2004 to the winner of the open category at the quadrennial World Team Olympiad, and since 2008 to the winner of the corresponding event at the World Mind Sports Games.

Vanderbilt invented the first strong club system, which he called the "Club Convention" but which has since become more usually known as the Vanderbilt Club. The strong club, or forcing club, family of bidding systems has performed exceptionally well in world championship play. He wrote four books on the subject.

Source:  Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Stirling_Vanderbilt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_contract_bridge

Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Weekly Hand Analysis - Mark Olsky - March 18, 2024 - Overcall

 


Mark:

The quick and simple answer to the question is NO! Why, you ask? 2 spades looks very likely to make, possibly with an overtrick or 2, depending on the efficiency of the defense. It's easy to know that if E-W can see each other's hands, or have some improper way to communicate their holdings. Assuming everyone is being ethical and playing within the rules, East should be too occupied with praying that partner doesn't re- open with a 2 heart bid to be looking for a good contract in spades or diamonds. 

What to do if partner does re- open with 2 hearts? Now it's a tossup between passing and bidding 2 spades. I agree with West's pass of 1NT. It looks risky to re- open opposite a passed partner. Remember that 2 spades by East directly over 1NT, is constructive and, in many partnerships, forcing at least 1 round. It might propel E-W to 4 spades, which is likely to be set.

  Most less than expert bridge players are familiar with basic strategy of casino Blackjack. Do you "take a hit" if you are dealt 18? What if you stand pat and see that the next card turned up is a 3? Does that mean you made a mistake by not taking the hit? The best question is what to do if faced with the same choice 10 times? If you take the hit and make similarly risky decisions, you will lose a lot of money while scoring the occasional brief gain. This is one of those times when East has an "opportunity" to make a winning but ill- advised bid. If W bids 2 hearts when 1NT comes back, that bid is also ill- advised, but becomes a winner if E now escapes to 2 spades (Also not necessarily a wise bid, but happens to be successful). The actual auction is what I would expect at a table with all "A" players. Good going, you 4! E has to choose a lead against 1 NT. It looks like a tossup. Some players would be a little reluctant to lead away from that spade holding, but most "A" players would lead it. Other things being equal, if the opponents have bid NT and made no attempt at finding a major suit fit, they might have a hidden minor suit fit that you could be helping them develop, but they are much less likely to have such a major suit fit. After a spade lead, 1NT probably goes set, but after a 4th best diamond, N might make an overtrick. It's a difficult hand to predict with a lot to think about for everyone, depending on the contract.

Weekly Hand Analysis - Vic Johnson - March 18, 2024 - Overcall


 Vic:

Answer: It depends.

 Many partners agree that Weak Two bids should be "disciplined" which is the approach I prefer. Basically, "disciplined" means that, although the hand is weak, the Weak Two suit should have some punch to it. A common standard (Vul) is two of top three or three of top five honors. Many partners agree to relax that standard a bit (NonVul), but the East hand is not one I would consider disciplined. 

 Other partners take an "anything goes" approach to Weak Two bids, with the only standard being a six card suit.

 West made a good decision to get in the auction, but a new suit at the two level should ideally be six cards in length & definitely be stronger than the suit they bid. I would encourage West to DBL, planning to bail out to NT if East makes a heart response. The West hand is strong enough to support that plan. Turns out EW deserve to make 2NT.

 The spade rebid by North (promising six spades) is highly flawed. They do not deserve to make even one spade. A much better choice by North would have been to Pass (my choice given that South has promised less than 6 HCPs) or 2H to show their two-suited hand. Turns out NS cannot take even seven tricks in any denomination.

 Ain't bridge a great game?

Weekly Hand Analysis - Rich Nordeng - March 11, 2024 - Slam

 

Rich:

Hard to bid these hands to slam with only 26 combined high card points. The perfect fit makes 6Hearts a reasonable contract, but even that is in jeopardy after a club opening lead, needing declarer to pick up the Queen of Hearts. That works here. Stretching to bid slams like this one is a losing proposition in the long run at match points.

Weekly Hand Analysis - Mark Olsky - March 11, 2024 - Bid

 

Mark:

I can't blame anyone in this case. The hands fit magically, and I don't think there's a legitimate way to discover that in a standard auction. The hands have a combined 22 high card points. In a mostly A level game, I expect that slightly more than half N-S pairs will get to 4 hearts. Among those pairs that do reach the game, it will be South, re- evaluating the hand as being worth an opening bid opposite a six card heart suit. I would bid 4 hearts directly over my partner's 2 heart re-bid, but not with absolute confidence. You can't expect North to bid again. South's 3 hearts, which is conservative but reasonable, asks North if they have anything extra beyond what has already been said. The answer is:  Nothing significantly extra.

  Now remember, the bidding is only an estimate of what will happen in the play. If you look at only the N-S hands, not knowing how any suits are divided or cards located in E-W, 4 hearts is a little better than 50%. Hearts and/or diamonds could break 4:1( about 50% combined), which would put 4 hearts in jeopardy.  As it happens on the actual deal, East has no damaging lead to make and would be very unlikely to prevent N from taking 11 tricks. To hold the hand to 10 tricks, E must underlead the ace of clubs and W must return a spade to establish a spade trick. If E-W found that defense, they would be suspected of being totally clueless or cheating.

Weekly Hand Analysis - Vic Johnson - March 11, 2024 - Overcall

 

Vic:

Answer: NO! 

Common advice from the experts urges caution with respect to two level overcalls, especially against experienced opponents eager to collect big scores via penalty doubles.  

Ideally, two level overcalls should reflect a strong 6-card suit. If only 5-cards, the suit should be especially solid. Given the three small spot cards, that is not true of the West hand. 

Given that they are not Vulnerable & already a passed hand, a frisky West might consider a Takeout DBL on their second chance to call. That creates two chances to find a golden fit with partner. Turns out EW deserve to make 4S. 

North/South deserve to make game in clubs & dropped the ball big time by not bidding it. 

Ain't bridge a great game?

 

Weekly Hand Analysis - Rich Nordeng - March 4, 2024 - Bid

 


Rich:

Generally, avoid preempts in first chair unless the hand is close to ideal. That rule applies even more so in the second seat. The reason is that your partner may have a good hand. Your preempt may interfere more with partner than with the opponents.

Here, the North hand is basically a textbook example of a four-level preempt .I agree with 4C with this hand.


Weekly Hand Analysis - Mark Olsky - March 4, 2024 - Jump

 

Question

Should N jump to 3C (or 2 NT) instead of bidding 2C?

Mark: 

Strong jump shifts have fallen out of favor, in my opinion for very good reasons. When one partner opens the bidding and the other has a hand good for a traditional jump shift, there's usually a good slam to be bid, as here. The jump takes up lots of bidding room and takes away space for a highly descriptive auction. This hand is a perfect case for the "2/1" system. If  N-S are playing this, the original 2 club response means the partnership is forced to game and slow, descriptive bidding can lead to slam. North was much too conservative anyway. Most experienced players would look at the North hand, "hear" partner open 1 spade and make sure of getting to slam. Even a slam invitation is not enough this time. North should re- assess this hand with 18 HCP and realize it becomes at least a 21 point hand in support of a known 5 card spade suit. The 4 spade bid was a closeout, not even inviting a slam. ^ spades directly would be a better bid. 

  For experts, the challenge of this hand is to get to the excellent grand slam. In a very high level game, 6 spades making 7 would be well below average. The magical 2 suited fit means that not only 7 spades, but 7NT has a 90% or better chance of  making. (7 clubs as well) Only experts are likely to have the bidding tools to get there with full confidence, especially the NT. In duplicate, 6 NT making 7 would score above average, because more than half the field will be in 6 spades only.

 Here's how the expert auction would go, assuming they play "2/1": 1S - 2C as was done here. Now South, with 3 clubs to the Q supports by bidding 3 clubs. There's no worry about being dropped at 3 clubs. Remember that both partners are committed not to stop below game. 

This is too complicated for the majority of regular bridge players. Just remember that when you hold a rock of a hand like North in this case, don't try to describe the hand to partner and expect partner to make the decision. The stronger, more complex hand is typically the one that should be the decider, as is the case here. 

Saturday, February 17, 2024

Weekly Hand Analysis - Vic Johnson - March 4, 2024 -Jacoby Transfer


Question:  The 2nd bid by West is probably wrong because there are only 5 spades instead of 6.  West knows E/W has enough points for game.  Should West just bid 3NT as the second bid because West does not have a second suit to determine whether East has Spades to support the Jacoby spade transfer?

Vic

Yes, you are exactly right. The second bid by West should be 3NT. If East has more than two spades, they can correct to 4S (if they wish to do so). 

Holding only 8-9 points (enough to only "invite" game), the second bid by West should be 2NT. If East does not want to go to game, but has more than two spades, they can correct to 3S (if they wish to do so).

 Ain't bridge a great game?

 



Friday, February 16, 2024

Bridge Quiz - February 19, 2024 Forcing

 In the Standard American Bridge Bidding  System which of the following is not forcing? Forcing means the opener or responder must bid for their next bid.

  1. When partner opens one of a suit and the responder bids a new suit.
  2. After a take-out double with no interference, a new suit at the one level
  3. A notrump response by responder
  4. Opener bids a new suit lower ranking than his first suit and partner responds at the two level
  5. An artificial bid such as 2 Clubs after 1NT
Information from Poll




Answer:

  • When partner opens one of a suit and the responder bids a new suit.
New suit by responder is a forcing bid as long as neither partner has bid no trump.
  • After a take-out double with no interference, a new suit at the one level
Take out doubles with no interference are always forcing no matter how many points you have in your hand
  • A notrump response by responder
Correct answer.  This is not forcing.  Opener may pass.
  • Opener bids a new suit lower ranking than his first suit and partner responds at the two level
When this happens it is called a reverse and it means opener has 17 or more points.  This requires a rebid by responder.  An example:
1D - 1S - 2H - ?
  • An artificial bid such as 2 Clubs after 1NT
Any artificial bid is always forcing.

References: 

Sunday, February 11, 2024

Weekly Hand Analysis - Mark Olsky - February 26, 2024 - Bid

 



Question:  All of us were not sure how to bid this hand.

Mark:

This is a case where if you look at just the N-S cards, you'd see 23 high card points, a nice 8 card fit in hearts and some mostly favorable distribution for a suit contract. North has a powerful hand and is likely to go to game if South shows any signs of life. After the very normal 3 passes North opens the very normal 1 heart. I hope no one would consider that hand worth a strong 2 bid. East could consider a takeout double, which TENDS to promise 4 spades in this situation, but not every time. With an imperfect hand for the double, E should at least be closer to a full opening bid when holding only 3 spades, so I agree with no double. Another option for E, if you are a compulsive non- passer, is 1NT by a passed hand, which suggests wanting to compete with a minor 2- suiter. That would lead to E-W buying the contract at 3 diamonds (probably making 3) or N-S getting too high. 

If I'm East on this hand, I'd be headed for a below average result, because I would do what most people would do and pass 1 heart. Most players will stretch to open in 3rd seat. When my partner fails to open in 3rd seat, it's probable the opponents have the balance of strength and I'll just help them with information on how to play the hand. remember that I don't know at that point that South is intending to pass 1heart. 

So, at my table 1 heart becomes the final contract, probably making 2 for 110 and a good N-S result. The actual bid of 2 clubs probably results in down 2, -100, which isn't great, but still better than -110. The upside of the 2 club bid is that if South is a compulsive non- passer and raises to 2 hearts, N probably jumps to game and EW will go plus even if they don't find the best defense. I expect N-S +110 mor 140 is fairly common and the 2 club bid, which I disagree with, is rewarded by the luck of the deal. Had  I made what I consider the 2nd best call for East (pass being my 1st choice), namely 1NT after North's 1 heart, we'd be on the road to a very good result, at least some sort of plus.


Weekly Hand Analysis - Vic Johnson - February 26, 2024 - Bid

 

Question:  South bid 3 diamonds and made 6.  How should the bidding have gone?

Vic:

Well, NS actually deserve all thirteen tricks playing in diamonds, although I suspect many NS would take only twelve. I also suspect many NS would find a no trump contract (rather than diamonds). Playing no trump, NS deserve to take eleven tricks.

 The auction shown above is pretty reasonable, except that North should not pass 3D. 

 The 1NT bid by North promised partner a bottom of the line opening hand (13-14 pts). South nevertheless opted to make a jump bid to 3D. The jump conveys the message that South is not ready to stop bidding. 

 Knowing they have a diamond fit & also that south bid spades on their first chance to call, I would encourage North to bid 3NT (rather than Pass) on their 3rd chance to call. That would probably end the auction.

 Bidding slam is challenging. I suspect only the most experienced pairs would manage that one. A key to doing so is for North to know about South's 6-card diamond suit. 

 On their first chance to call, I would consequently encourage South to bid 1D (not 1S). Bidding 1D poses no danger of missing a spade fit. And it creates the possibility of a diamond rebid to promise six.

 The knowledge that they probably have six tricks off the top in diamonds, might encourage experienced players to explore for slam.

 Ain't bridge a great game?

 


Thursday, February 8, 2024

Bridge Quiz - February 5, 2024

 

You are sitting South.  North, your partner, is the dealer and has a balanced hand with 15 HCPs.   He bids 1NT.  You have a hand of 10 points with 4 spades, 4 hearts, 3 diamonds, and 2 clubs.  You very much want to use the Stayman convention to tell your partner about your majors.  East bids 2C.  This wrecks your plans to bid 2 for Stayman.  What do you do? 

  1. Look at your computer screen and scream, “East can’t do that to me!”
  2. Double
  3. Assume Stayman is off and bid your hand at 2.
  4. Pass

 Answer:  Depending on how you and your partner are getting along, 2 or 3 could be the answer.  Option 2 is called a “stolen bid’ double and tells your partner, East stole your bid, continue with Stayman.  If you have no such understanding, you can assume Staymen is off and bid your hand in Option 3. 

Reference on Stolen Bid Doubles - https://www.bridgeaholic.com/download/stolen-bids.pdf

 Comment from Duane:

Before the advent of stolen bid double, the standard among good tournament players was with game values, and one or two 4 card majors, you would bid 3 clubs with this hand showing this.

 They then show their clubs under control.

 With this tool, many of us do not need stolen bid doubles which are not used by most good (experienced) players.

Bridge Quiz - February 12, 2024

Situation:  For some reason, your sub-conscious decides you should have a dream about contract bridge.  You are in the Bridge Club of Madison's Todd Drive facility.  In your dream, you are sitting South.  Your partner is sitting North.  Glenna Shannahan is sitting East.  Stan Fuhrmann is sitting West.  Stan and Glenna are Bridge Life Masters and so you begin thinking in your dream that this could be a nightmare.    

Glenna is the dealer.

 You have the following hand:

♠65

1053

A42

♣AKQ52

 You have 13HCPs with one length point and think, “I can open with 1♣. Yeah!”  You are ready to do a happy dance but Glenna looks at you, reads your mind, and bids 1♣ before you can bid your 1♣.  You start sweating because you don’t know what to do.  Stan sees your distress and smiles at you.  You assume he wants to help you but can’t because of bridge rules. What do you do? 

  • 1.     Suggest to  Glenna that Pass is a better bid than 1
  • 2.     Pass and ask to Glenna if you can enroll in her next beginning bridge class
  • 3.     Pass and bid clubs at your next bid
  • 4.     Bid 2
  • 5.     Excuse yourself, go to the bathroom, and hope you wake up from your dream

Ralph's Researched Answer:

One of Vic Johnson's most famous responses to bridge questions is, "It depends."  That response can be supplied to this answer because there is a difference in opinion from many players as to what to do.

The answer depends on what you and your partner agree to or no agree to.  The best place to find what you agree to is something called a Convention Card which you and your partner should have if you play duplicate bridge on BBO or at a club setting.

I think the Convention Card is misnamed.  I think it should be called a Bridge Signal Card.  This card summarizes how you and your partner will generally play a bridge hand. 

For my purpose and probably yours, you will need to look at your Convention Card in the the Direct Cuebid section.

Note the Natural and Michaels notation on the left side.  If the Michaels box(es) are checked then Answer 4 - 2is not correct.  A Michaels cue bid indicates 5 hearts and 5 spades, neither one you have.  If Natural is checked, then 2is valid although you alert your opponents to a Natural Bid in BBO and your partner alerts a Natural Bid when you play duplicate in a club setting. (The red lettering on a Convention Card means an alertable bid.)
The reason a Natural Bid is an alertable bid is because most people interpret a 2bid after a 1bid as a Michaels cuebid. You are not allowed to mislead your opponents in bridge and so you must tell them this bid is a Natural Bid and not a Michaels cuebid.

If the Michaels cuebid boxes are checked then the correct answer to the quiz is 3.  Pass and bid clubs at the next bid.

Information on Michaels Cuebid can be found at https://www.bridgebum.com/michaels_cuebid.php

Vic Johnson completed a series of excellent videos on Convention Cards in 2001.  These four videos are:
Regarding the club bid after passing.  See response to c)  in the first section of exercises.