Question:
Should N jump to 3C (or 2 NT) instead of bidding 2C?
Mark:
Strong jump shifts have fallen out of favor, in my opinion
for very good reasons. When one partner opens the bidding and the other has a
hand good for a traditional jump shift, there's usually a good slam to be
bid, as here. The jump takes up lots of bidding room and takes away space for a
highly descriptive auction. This hand is a perfect case for the "2/1"
system. If N-S are playing this, the original 2 club response means the
partnership is forced to game and slow, descriptive bidding can lead to slam. North was much too conservative anyway. Most experienced players would look at the
North hand, "hear" partner open 1 spade and make sure of getting to
slam. Even a slam invitation is not enough this time. North should re- assess
this hand with 18 HCP and realize it becomes at least a 21 point hand in
support of a known 5 card spade suit. The 4 spade bid was a closeout, not even
inviting a slam. ^ spades directly would be a better bid.
For experts, the challenge of this hand is to get to
the excellent grand slam. In a very high level game, 6 spades making 7 would be
well below average. The magical 2 suited fit means that not only 7 spades, but
7NT has a 90% or better chance of making. (7 clubs as well) Only
experts are likely to have the bidding tools to get there with full confidence,
especially the NT. In duplicate, 6 NT making 7 would score above average,
because more than half the field will be in 6 spades only.
Here's how the expert auction would go, assuming they play "2/1": 1S - 2C as was done here. Now South, with 3 clubs to the Q supports by bidding 3 clubs. There's no worry about being dropped at 3 clubs. Remember that both partners are committed not to stop below game.
This is too
complicated for the majority of regular bridge players. Just remember that when
you hold a rock of a hand like North in this case, don't try to describe
the hand to partner and expect partner to make the decision. The stronger, more
complex hand is typically the one that should be the decider, as is the case
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment