Sunday, December 13, 2020

Weekly Hand Analysis - Vic Johnson - December 14, 2020- 2 Bids


Question;  During your December 7th discussion you talked about 2 bids.  Would you analyze the hand and discuss what you meant when you said “Never let opponent play at the 2 level where they have a fit.” 


Vic:

Are you talking about a 2 bid by Opener? by Responder? by Overcaller? by Advancer? It makes a difference. A 2 bid by any of those people could be good or bad, depending on what their hand looks like. A generic statement that "2 bids are bad" does not make sense. It is difficult to imagine that I ever said that. 

In the example above the 2D bid is a second call by opener. It is a perfectly acceptable bid that tells partner they have a two-suited hand (as opposed to a balanced hand) with a diamond suit that is either the same length or shorter than their spade suit. It also clarifies that they are towards the bottom edge of the 13-21 points they promised when they opened.

The quote "Never let opponent play at the 2 level where they have a fit.” is correct - it is a standard rule of defensive bidding. It does not apply in this situation, however, because opponents have not demonstrated they have a "fit". South has shown a two-suited hand & north has simply indicated they prefer diamonds to spades (maybe the lesser of two evils). So, although you have a strong enough hand to push the auction, there is no reason for you to do so, especially vulnerable.

 

Also, when you are in the balancing seat & it is appropriate to push you have two options. 1) you can bid (better have a good 5+ card suit)   2) you can DBL asking partner to bid their longest suit (better have "tolerance" in the suits they might bid)

 


 

No comments:

Post a Comment