Question: What does a double after a 1NT bid indicate?
The standard meaning, if you haven't made a clear other
agreement with your partner (which would then have to be Alerted), is equal
strength or better to the opponent's NT range. (i.e If, for example, the
opponents are playing a 12 to 15 NT range, you could double with 13.) I'm not
saying that makes it a good idea, but it would fit the standard meaning. In
this case, I assume that N bid 1NT with 15 to 17, so E, with 7 high card points
promised at least 15. This is not only a problem for the current hand, but
could plant distrust in your partner for many future hands. If W trusts E,
looking at 6 points and expecting your partner to have at least 15, shouldn't
you double 3NT? I would double 2NT. Even if you have an unusual convention
that says you have a heart diamond 2 suiter, this is the wrong hand for it. The
hand is too weak and the suits aren't nearly good enough.
One problem with bidding over a 1NT and, (of course)
2NT is that the opening bid is very descriptive. The opener's partner knows if
you've just stepped into a bad spot. Experienced players will start doubling
when it's in their best interest, which is quite frequent. In this case, the
perpetrator of the unwise double might escape a full disaster because of the
very favorable vulnerability, but the damage to partnership confidence, as
noted above, has a future cost.
Here's a bit of practical advice about bidding over
the opponents' NT opening; especially when opponents are using the common
15-17. Just Don't. By this I don't mean the popular DONT convention,
which helps you describe a number of hands. However, unless you have lots of
experience and a solid partnership, it's easy to get burned even when your hand
can be described to a T. Suppose you have a 20 point hand and your right hand
opponent opens 1NT. It feels strange to pass, but where would you hope to
get. It's rare to have a game when the opponents open 1NT. I would favor
a specialized purpose convention for the double of 1NT. There are several such
conventions. My own favorite is to show a single good suit and a decent hand in
general. Partner is expected to bid 2 clubs, which you pass if that is your
suit, or you bid your suit next.
Just an aside about South's 2NT invitational raise
instead of 3NT. You know that you have at least 25 points in the partnership.
Most players would bid game directly rather than just invite. If game is
made at most tables, you get a terrible result. Imagine that the opening NT
bidder is the kind of player that makes really shaky bids (Kind of like the
current East). Now you underbid and you might start a chain reaction of shaky
bids.
No comments:
Post a Comment